Re: Suggestion: tempo ranges

[John Zaitseff]

Dear Han-Wen,

> John Zaitseff wrote:
>
> > > I´m not saying it´s too difficult; I´m saying I won´t apply
> > > your patch :-)
> >
> > Not trying to be difficult, but given that this idea (of tempo
> > ranges) seems to me to be a reasonable one, is there any reason
> > why not?  I realise that it is a syntax change; is that reason
> > enough?
>

> I think it is a feature that will only benefit few users, and does
> not warrant an extension of the parser.  Changing the syntax is
> problematic because it may in the future prevent us from doing
> other changes.

Well, that's fair enough.

> What is the problem with using a music function?

Nothing really, except that it would have been nice to have the
syntactic sugar of "\tempo 4. = 92-96" as I suggested.

Yours truly,

John Zaitseff

-- 
John Zaitseff                    ,--_|\    The ZAP Group
Phone:  +61 2 9643 7737         /      \   Sydney, Australia
E-mail: address@hidden   \_,--._*   http://www.zap.org.au/
                                      v