Re: [PATCH v2] Fix crash when a stencil routine is missing

[Graham Percival]

On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 07:09:11AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > and I'm not certain that we have enough Frogs to eat all the issues
> > that would be added if we went this route.
> 
> Perhaps it makes sense to classify regression tests like this:
> 
>   a) intentionally emit warnings and errors
>   b) unintentionally emit warnings
>   c) run fine

I don't see a huge urgency for this patch, so I would rather wait
until b) was non-existent.  I totally agree that we should split
a) and c), though.

Let's wait until Patrick reports how many regtests unintentionally
emit warnings, and see how much work is involved in fixing those.

Cheers,
- Graham