[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal
From: |
John Mandereau |
Subject: |
Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:35:47 +0200 |
Le mardi 04 août 2009 à 07:30 -0600, Carl Sorensen a écrit :
> So, I have heartburn about regressions on the stable branch as indicated by
> failure to pass the regtest. But I have no heartburn about "regressions"
> that mean a complicated example that uses tweaks doesn't look right any
> more.
I agree with your point, and if I understand it well, it doesn't give a
justification for not generating examples from the sources with binary
from the sources. However, complicated examples are like real users
scores, which shouldn't suffer from the need of syntax updates other
what convert-ly can handle, in case we ever allow convert-lyable syntax
changes in a stable branch -- IIRC we don't want to, do we?
I think changes in formatting that make some tweaks no longer necessary
imply should be handled by convert-ly, or alternatively should be pushed
to a development branch.
Best,
John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, John Mandereau, 2009/08/02
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Graham Percival, 2009/08/03
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, John Mandereau, 2009/08/03
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Graham Percival, 2009/08/03
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, John Mandereau, 2009/08/03
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Graham Percival, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, John Mandereau, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Carl Sorensen, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal,
John Mandereau <=
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Graham Percival, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, John Mandereau, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, John Mandereau, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Graham Percival, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, John Mandereau, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Graham Percival, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Francisco Vila, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Till Paala, 2009/08/07
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Till Paala, 2009/08/07
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Andrew Hawryluk, 2009/08/08