[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the "r" in "git pull -r"
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: the "r" in "git pull -r" |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Aug 2009 16:21:19 -0600 |
On 8/9/09 3:45 PM, "John Mandereau" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Le samedi 08 août 2009 à 13:55 -0600, Carl Sorensen a écrit :
>> As a practical matter, -r first applies the changes that were made on origin
>> (since your branch was checked out), then applies your changes on top of the
>> current origin. The prevents an extra commit to merge your branch with
>> origin, and keeps the git history cleaner.
>>
>> My recommendation is to always use it; it makes things much nicer.
>
> I agree, except when docs in English are edited and translations
> committishes are updated before edited docs in English are pushed.
> Until now, only translators did this, but I'm going to add a feature (I
> added it, but it's untested) that saves translators' work and only
> require doc editors to run a script every time they make the same
> changes in all languages. I'm adding a note in the CG about this.
Perfect! I hope I didn't mess up the translated docs too badly with my
recent merge.
Carl
- the "r" in "git pull -r", Mark Polesky, 2009/08/07
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", John Mandereau, 2009/08/08
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Carl Sorensen, 2009/08/08
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Graham Percival, 2009/08/09
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Graham Percival, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Graham Percival, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/10
- lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/10
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Maximilian Albert, 2009/08/11