[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: neo-modern-voice?
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: neo-modern-voice? |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:31:16 +0100 |
2009/10/17 Frédéric Bron <address@hidden>:
> - the addition to scm/music-functions.scm uses standard indentation,
Not quite. Compare your additions to the previous rule (neo-modern-cautionary).
> - I modified slightly the example for all automatic accidental styles
> (the same for all), in particular added staff change,
+ \showStaffSwitch \change Staff = up
new line for \change Staff = up
Apart from these nitpicks, it looks fine.
Regards,
Neil
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Frédéric Bron, 2009/10/16
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Neil Puttock, 2009/10/16
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Frédéric Bron, 2009/10/16
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Graham Percival, 2009/10/16
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Neil Puttock, 2009/10/16
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Graham Percival, 2009/10/16
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Frédéric Bron, 2009/10/17
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Frédéric Bron, 2009/10/17
- Re: neo-modern-voice?,
Neil Puttock <=
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Frédéric Bron, 2009/10/20
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Graham Percival, 2009/10/20
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Neil Puttock, 2009/10/21
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Neil Puttock, 2009/10/16