Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf

[Graham Percival]

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:21:16AM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le jeudi 12 novembre 2009 à 00:21 +0100, John Mandereau a écrit :
> > Does the attached patch convince you to go on on Waf?
> 
> Actually, please ignore my patch and checkout a SVN copy of Waf instead
> 
> svn checkout http://waf.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ && mv trunk waf
> 
> then invoke waf-light from this checkout.

I'm already working from waf.  I did an svn update.  It still
fails the first time I run it, while working perfectly the second
time.

In case there's any misunderstanding, I'm talking about the
dev/gperciva branch.  The minimal example that Thomas Nagy sent
works just fine.


1)  if you can't duplicate the problem after checking out
dev/gperciva, then I'll check a third time to see if there's any
old version of waf floating around on this machine.

2)  if you can duplicate it in dev/gperciva, then please either
fix the problem in my wscripts, or follow up with the waf people
(if you can extract another small example).

Cheers,
- Graham