[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:20:43 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 09:42:05PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le jeudi 12 novembre 2009 à 17:54 +0000, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > 1) if you can't duplicate the problem after checking out
> > dev/gperciva, then I'll check a third time to see if there's any
> > old version of waf floating around on this machine.
>
> No, I couldn't duplicate. But, it might be necessary to clear some
> cache using distclean, then reconfigure, so you can have a command like
I clear the cache with rm -rf waf-out
On the 16th, I gave up and fixed this one myself. However, I
discovered that I couldn't copy files from srcdir into the blddir
without changing their name, which kind-of borks
Documentation/pictures/. That message is on -devel somewhere.
Waf is dead until at least after 2.14.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: serious doubts about waf, (continued)
- [PATCH] Re: serious doubts about waf, John Mandereau, 2009/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] Re: serious doubts about waf, Graham Percival, 2009/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf, John Mandereau, 2009/11/12
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf, Graham Percival, 2009/11/12
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf, Graham Percival, 2009/11/14
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf, John Mandereau, 2009/11/24
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf, John Mandereau, 2009/11/24
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf, Graham Percival, 2009/11/25