[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Code review/discussion time again.
From: |
Reinhold Kainhofer |
Subject: |
Re: Code review/discussion time again. |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:17:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.12.3 (Linux/2.6.31-14-generic; KDE/4.3.3; i686; ; ) |
Am Sonntag, 22. November 2009 07:49:04 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:
> > And if you have the source tree in a git repository, then it's trivial to
> > make branches, and checkout the appropriate branch. That way you don't
> > have to worry about overwrites (and if you do have overwrite problems,
> > then you just reset the head).
> >
> > It's no problem at all, if you do it that way.
>
> Hello merge conflict, my old friend, I've come to talk with you again...
>
> If you have ever worked in a project with a central ChangeLog file, you
> know the permanent hassle with switching branches when some changes
> require entries in a central file.
With git this is not really a problem. I'm constantly working with 5-10
different branches. Every now and then, I rebase them to current master, but
apart from that each branch is isolated, doesn't influence each other, and
changes to the global news file, etc. can be merged when I want to do a
rebase.
Really, once you have learned how to use git rebase (and the manual merging it
sometimes requires), working with branches in git is really no problem at all.
Cheers,
Reinhold
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, address@hidden, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
* http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
* LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., (continued)
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Carl Sorensen, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/22
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Carl Sorensen, 2009/11/22
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/11/22
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/23
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Reinhold Kainhofer, 2009/11/23
- Re: Code review/discussion time again.,
Reinhold Kainhofer <=
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/23
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/11/22
Re: Code review/discussion time again., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/11/22