Re: Disagree with recent DOC change

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:02 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> I don't think that this is useful advice since binaries often are
>>> incompatible with Scheme/Lilypond trees of other versions, and since
>>> many regressions are not introduced in the binaries.
>>
>> Trevor meant the GUB packages, which install the "actual binary"
>> as well as the scheme stuff, fonts, etc.
>
> Then the proper wording is "downloading binary releases" or "binary
> packages".  But "binaries" means something different.

I think this is nitpicking; we don't release just the binary files
separately; people'd have to go through contortions to do what you
think is suggested.

-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen