[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Disagree with recent DOC change
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Disagree with recent DOC change |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:44:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.90 (gnu/linux) |
"Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden> writes:
>> Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> I think this is nitpicking; we don't release just the binary files
>>> separately; people'd have to go through contortions to do what you
>>> think is suggested.
>>
>> Well, _I_ understood the wording wrong. Do you really want to bet
>> your
>> life on it that I am the most stupid person possibly ever working
>> with
>> Lilypond, so that nobody else possibly could misunderstand?
>
> Well, you are the only one in four of us ;) We commonly
> refer to the GUB binary release packages as "binaries".
I don't consider it a good idea to demand full insider jargon mastery in
the instructions for people who are not able to use git and/or compile
Lilypond.
That's not the right frame of mind for recruiting new developers.
> Not a problem. I've already done it. Thanks for the suggestion.
You are welcome.
--
David Kastrup
Re: Disagree with recent DOC change, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/02/08