Re: ghostscript fonts (was: new smaller installers to test)

[Patrick McCarty]

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Graham Percival
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> I am a little worried that it might depend on how the font is laid out
>> internally.  Perhaps we should let this slip for now, but look into
>> this as the first suspect when problems with international font
>> rendering pop up.
>
> We had one report on the bug list about fonts on windows.  I've added
> the Fonts dir back.
>
> 2.13.13-2 is here:
> http://lilypond.org/~graham/

I can only test linux-x86 right now, and the test file Martial sent to
bug-lilypond (invalid-font.ly) compiles fine with 2.13.13-2.

> Other than that, I agree that we should leave it for now.  I have no
> problem adding some (all?) of these dirs back, but let's wait for more
> bug reports or other evidence that we actually need them.

I agree.

Thanks,
Patrick