[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OSX 10.5+
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: OSX 10.5+ |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:18:42 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 07:31:37PM +0100, James Bailey wrote:
> As I understand it, the critical problems previously had with lilypond on
> 10.5 (and now 10.6) have been resolved. And since the issue was just
> raised on the -user list. Would it be useful now to simply have the
> PPC/Intel binaries (labeled as such)?
I don't understand. This page looks pretty clear to me:
http://lilypond.org/~graham/website/macos-x.html
Shows x86 / PPC. The text says Intel / G3 and G4. What's the
issue?
Cheers,
- Graham
- OSX 10.5+, James Bailey, 2010/02/22
- Re: OSX 10.5+,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: OSX 10.5+, James Bailey, 2010/02/23
- Re: OSX 10.5+, Patrick McCarty, 2010/02/23
- Re: OSX 10.5+, James Bailey, 2010/02/23
- Re: OSX 10.5+, Patrick McCarty, 2010/02/23
- Re: OSX 10.5+, James Bailey, 2010/02/23
- Re: OSX 10.5+, Patrick McCarty, 2010/02/23
- Re: OSX 10.5+, James Bailey, 2010/02/24
- Re: OSX 10.5+, Patrick McCarty, 2010/02/24
Re: OSX 10.5+, James Bailey, 2010/02/23