Re: OSX 10.5+

[James Bailey]

On 23.02.2010, at 02:18, Graham Percival wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 07:31:37PM +0100, James Bailey wrote:
> > As I understand it, the critical problems previously had with  
> > lilypond on
> > 10.5 (and now 10.6) have been resolved. And since the issue was just
> > raised on the -user list. Would it be useful now to simply have the
> > PPC/Intel binaries (labeled as such)?
>
> I don't understand.  This page looks pretty clear to me:
> http://lilypond.org/~graham/website/macos-x.html
>
> Shows x86 / PPC.  The text says Intel / G3 and G4.  What's the
> issue?
>
> Cheers,
> - Graham

The issue being that a very intelligent user might go to http:// 
lilypond.org/install/ instead. Which still has the 10.5 (Leopard),  
10.4 (Intel) and 10.3 and newer links.