Re: OSX 10.5+

[Patrick McCarty]

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:46 PM, James Bailey
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 23.02.2010, at 02:18, Graham Percival wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 07:31:37PM +0100, James Bailey wrote:
>>>
>>> As I understand it, the critical problems previously had with lilypond on
>>> 10.5 (and now 10.6) have been resolved. And since the issue was just
>>> raised on the -user list. Would it be useful now to simply have the
>>> PPC/Intel binaries (labeled as such)?
>>
>> I don't understand.  This page looks pretty clear to me:
>> http://lilypond.org/~graham/website/macos-x.html
>>
>> Shows x86 / PPC.  The text says Intel / G3 and G4.  What's the
>> issue?
>
> The issue being that a very intelligent user might go to
> http://lilypond.org/install/ instead. Which still has the 10.5 (Leopard),
> 10.4 (Intel) and 10.3 and newer links.

Patches accepted.  :-)  From you or anyone else interested.

The code for the current website is here:

http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/web;hb=web

I would rather spend my LilyPond time on other issues, or else I would
fix it myself.

Thanks,
Patrick