lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Error in fretted-strings.itely? (was: Re: Enhancement: tabalture chord r


From: Marc Hohl
Subject: Error in fretted-strings.itely? (was: Re: Enhancement: tabalture chord repetition (issue224082))
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 12:20:22 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)

Marc Hohl schrieb:
Nicolas Sceaux schrieb:
Le 1 mars 2010 à 10:00, Marc Hohl a écrit :

address@hidden schrieb:
http://codereview.appspot.com/224082/diff/1/3
File ly/chord-repetition-init.ly (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/224082/diff/1/3#newcode51
ly/chord-repetition-init.ly:51: #(define-public (tab-repeat-chord
previous-chord location duration articulations)
It would be better to define a generic repetition function, taking the event types that should be kept for NoteEvents. default-repeat-chord and tab-repeat-chord would then use this function. I'm writing it on other
post.
Done. Thanks for this improvement!

Marc

http://codereview.appspot.com/224082/show

Shouldn't there be a few words of explantion about using q and
\tabChordRepetition somewhere in 2.4.1 "Common notation for fretted
strings"?
I'll have a look at it.
At the beginning of Documentation/notation/fretted-instruments.itely, it says:

@warning{String numbers @strong{must} be defined inside a chord
construct even if there is only a single note.}

But something like c4\4 works pretty well, and IIUC, the comments
in lily/tab-note-heads-engraver.cc verify that string numbers are
allowed within and outside chord constructs. So, while adding
some remarks about  \tabChordRepetition, should I delete the @warning{...} ?

Marc





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]