|
From: | Marc Hohl |
Subject: | Error in fretted-strings.itely? (was: Re: Enhancement: tabalture chord repetition (issue224082)) |
Date: | Mon, 01 Mar 2010 12:20:22 +0100 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) |
Marc Hohl schrieb:
At the beginning of Documentation/notation/fretted-instruments.itely, it says:Nicolas Sceaux schrieb:Le 1 mars 2010 à 10:00, Marc Hohl a écrit :address@hidden schrieb:http://codereview.appspot.com/224082/diff/1/3 File ly/chord-repetition-init.ly (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/224082/diff/1/3#newcode51 ly/chord-repetition-init.ly:51: #(define-public (tab-repeat-chord previous-chord location duration articulations)It would be better to define a generic repetition function, taking the event types that should be kept for NoteEvents. default-repeat-chord and tab-repeat-chord would then use this function. I'm writing it on otherpost.Done. Thanks for this improvement! Marc http://codereview.appspot.com/224082/showShouldn't there be a few words of explantion about using q and \tabChordRepetition somewhere in 2.4.1 "Common notation for fretted strings"?I'll have a look at it.
@warning{String numbers @strong{must} be defined inside a chord construct even if there is only a single note.} But something like c4\4 works pretty well, and IIUC, the comments in lily/tab-note-heads-engraver.cc verify that string numbers are allowed within and outside chord constructs. So, while adding some remarks about \tabChordRepetition, should I delete the @warning{...} ? Marc
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |