lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Can not make install


From: Boris Shingarov
Subject: Re: Can not make install
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:19:37 -0400
User-agent: Webmail 5.0

oh, also, "does it occur on make doc, or on make install" ?
 
Maybe that's just a missed dependency.  It occurs on "make install"
after a successful "make all".  The error message is this:
 
# make install
.. // bunch of successful stuff...
..
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/boris/lilypond/Documentation'
cp -p contributor.texi out/contributor.texi
export LILYPOND_DATADIR=
export
PYTHONPATH=/home/boris/lilypond/python/out:../python/auxiliar:/home/boris/lilypond/python/out:./python/auxiliar:
/usr/bin/python /home/boris/lilypond/stepmake/bin/install.py -c -d
/usr/local/share/info
install-info --remove --info-dir=/usr/local/share/info
./out/lilypond-usage.info ;  install-info --remove
--info-dir=/usr/local/share/info ./out/lilypond-changes.info ; 
install-info --remove --info-dir=/usr/local/share/info
./out/lilypond-contributor.info ;  install-info --remove
--info-dir=/usr/local/share/info ./out/lilypond-internals.info ; 
install-info --remove --info-dir=/usr/local/share/info
./out/lilypond-essay.info ;  install-info --remove
--info-dir=/usr/local/share/info ./out/lilypond-learning.info ; 
install-info --remove --info-dir=/usr/local/share/info
./out/lilypond-notation.info ;  install-info --remove
--info-dir=/usr/local/share/info ./out/music-glossary.info ; 
install-info --remove --info-dir=/usr/local/share/info
./out/lilypond-web.info ;  install-info --remove
--info-dir=/usr/local/share/info ./out/lilypond-extending.info ; true
install-info(./out/lilypond-usage.info): no entry for file `lilypond-usage'
install-info(./out/lilypond-changes.info): no entry for file
`lilypond-changes'
install-info(./out/lilypond-contributor.info): no entry for file
`lilypond-contributor'
install-info(./out/lilypond-internals.info): deleting entry `* LilyPond
Internals Reference: (lilypond-internals) ...'
install-info(./out/lilypond-essay.info): no entry for file `lilypond-essay'
install-info(./out/lilypond-learning.info): deleting entry `* LilyPond
Learning Manual: (lilypond-learning) ...'
install-info(./out/lilypond-notation.info): deleting entry `* LilyPond:
(lilypond-notation) ...'
install-info(./out/music-glossary.info): deleting entry `* Music
Glossary: (music-glossary) ...'
install-info(./out/lilypond-web.info): no entry for file `lilypond-web'
install-info(./out/lilypond-extending.info): no entry for file
`lilypond-extending'
install-info --info-dir=/usr/local/share/info ./out/lilypond-web.info

No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'.
install-info(./out/lilypond-web.info): unable to determine description
for `dir' entry - giving up
make[1]: *** [local-install-info] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/boris/lilypond/Documentation'
make: *** [install] Error 2
#
 
Now, after that, invoking "make doc" results in building things I am
positive were not required for "install" before.
 
I'm not particularly concerned if "make install"
is broken with old libraries, since only package
managers need to run that.
 
My end users run that.  I don't want to get into that old thread about
"release early" and "cathedral" stuff; but for me, your argument in
that thread was convincing because I see Lilypond as in some sense
similar to Debian, where "stable" means dynosaur bones.  I fix bugs
that my users are saying get in the way of their production work, and
implement and contribute back features that they need to continue their
production work.  I could base this work off the stable 2.12, but are
you willing to look at patches against 2.12's page-breaking code, which
is completely replaced in 2.13?  Therefore, I obviously must do
development against the latest master.  But the direction this
development is driven by my users; in fact, my patches get tested in
the field on production manuscripts before they even get uploaded on
appspot.  If "make install" is broken for users, this whole model of
development breaks down.
 
I wouldn't even care about this at all -- because I am not experiencing
this problem on my development machine -- if not the outcry of my users
who today can not use any of what I wrote in the past weeks.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]