[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material.
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material. |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Apr 2010 11:38:46 -0400 |
Hi Carl et al,
> I believe that this indentation scheme is more consistent with standard
> Scheme indentation than the other. (parser location args) is at the same
> list level as (arg-type-predicates) so it should have the same or higher
> indentation, not lower.
>
> I like this, and would be very satisfied with making it the standard.
If you need a "janitor" to clean things up, I might be available -- this might
help me learn about Scheme, which I want to do ASAP.
Cheers,
Kieren.
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., (continued)
Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Graham Percival, 2010/04/26
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Carl Sorensen, 2010/04/26
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Graham Percival, 2010/04/26
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Carl Sorensen, 2010/04/26
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Nicolas Sceaux, 2010/04/27
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Mark Polesky, 2010/04/27
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Carl Sorensen, 2010/04/27
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material.,
Kieren MacMillan <=