[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material.
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material. |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:49:26 -0600 |
On 4/26/10 10:21 AM, "Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 06:34:53PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
>> Notwithstanding that specific issue, any suggestions,
>> objections, etc?
>
> I object to the scheme indentation -- to the extent that we have a
> standard for lilypond input files (which isn't much), we follow
> normal scheme indentation.
The new patch actually follows normal Scheme indentation, where the previous
examples didn't.
Thanks,
Carl
- PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Mark Polesky, 2010/04/25
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Graham Percival, 2010/04/26
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material.,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Graham Percival, 2010/04/26
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Carl Sorensen, 2010/04/26
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Nicolas Sceaux, 2010/04/27
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Mark Polesky, 2010/04/27
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Carl Sorensen, 2010/04/27
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Kieren MacMillan, 2010/04/27