[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: status of regtest doc'ing
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: status of regtest doc'ing |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Jun 2010 23:28:48 +0200 |
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Graham Percival
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Well, could Kieren pick up where you left off? He probably knows
> the docs as well as you do, and he's certainly familiar with
> Internals, the snippets, and the main manuals.
Sure, if that's the most efficient way we want to use his time :)
I believe I ceased to be thorough right after the lyrics-* stuff.
> Having somebody else handle the minute scouring-through-regtests
> could free your time up to handle the overall organization.
> - somebody needs to look through regtests
> - somebody needs to decide what goes to LSR, what goes to
> Documentation/snippets/new/, and what goes in Notation.
> - somebody needs to add stuff to LSR. (Phil's been doing a great
> job of this)
> - somebody needs to add stuff to D/s/n.
> - somebody needs to write English+ly examples to explain stuff
> that will go in Notation.
> - somebody needs to add stuff to Notation (i.e. make the actual
> patches)
> - somebody needs to make sure all these jobs are covered, train
> any volunteers that need training, etc.
>
> It doesn't make sense to ask everybody to wait around while you
> work on the first item if that could be handled by somebody else.
That's not at all what I am asking. I'd just like to finish through
before *Verifying* what has been properly documented or not. So, jobs
#2 to #6 look perfectly available to me in the meantime :-)
Cheers,
Valentin