Re: status of regtest doc'ing

[Valentin Villenave]

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Graham Percival
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Valentin,

Hi,

> What's the overall status of
> http://wiki.lilynet.net/index.php/Regtests
> ?

It's active-whenever-I-have-time-to-work-on-it. Which means, it's
likely to be completed before the end of the month but unlikely for
the next week or so.

> In particular, how much of the regtests have you gone through?

About half, I'd say.

> Do you
> want to delete items from the wiki once they've been handled, or would
> that create more confusion?

My plan was to first finish the list without ever looking back, then
take the list again and check what had been addressed and delete
"Verified" items, until there weren't any left.

> Which items (if any) can be added to LSR
> (Phil Holmes seems to be good at this), and which items (if any)
> should be added to Documentation/snippets/new/  (which I think James
> Lowe will handle) ?

That is out of my hands. I just list missing or unsufficient
documentation. I suppose most items can safely be LSRized, and are not
new features but old features that haven't been documented when they
were added (the LilyPond project was probably a bit sloppier wrt
documentation back then, pre-GDP times and all).

> I don't want to organize this stuff myself.

The point is to make you not having to.

Cheers,
Valentin.