Re: Subdivide as beamExceptions?

[Xavier Scheuer]

On 11 August 2010 19:43, Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I'm sorry, I mixed two different ideas in my earlier reply to you.
>
> Obviously, for what you want, a beamExceptions entry with subdivide
> is the correct solution.
>
> Thanks for calling it to my attention,

I'm sorry, I'm still confused.  :s

Is it *currently* possible to define a beamExceptions entry with
subdivide?

And if yes, how?
(I could not find information about defining a "subdivide rule" in the
doc and everything I tried failed miserably)...

Many thanks and sorry for the disturbance.

Cheers,
Xavier

--
Xavier Scheuer <address@hidden>