[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: follow-up to report 22
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: follow-up to report 22 |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Nov 2010 12:48:36 -0600 |
On 11/5/10 11:40 AM, "Valentin Villenave" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> 2) Any description of the history may be irrelevant to the future
>
> Is it for us to decide?
>
Nope. And it's impossible for anybody to decide until it becomes an active
part of the LilyPond infrastructure, so I think it makes sense to defer.
Thanks,
Carl
- Re: follow-up to report 22, (continued)
- Re: follow-up to report 22, David Kastrup, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Graham Percival, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Carl Sorensen, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Graham Percival, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Carl Sorensen, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Carl Sorensen, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Carl Sorensen, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: follow-up to report 22, David Kastrup, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Joe Neeman, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Joe Neeman, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/06
- Re: follow-up to report 22, David Kastrup, 2010/11/07
- Re: follow-up to report 22, David Kastrup, 2010/11/05