Re: accidental.ly regtest

[Trevor Daniels]

Carl Sorensen wrote Tuesday, December 14, 2010 12:55 PM
> On Dec 14, 2010, at 5:45 AM, "Dmytro O. Redchuk"
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > I fail to see why this test (accidental.ly) would be less 
> > valuable
> > if there
> > would be "\key c \major", let's say.
>
> Because you want to ensure that it behaves properly. The best fix,
> IMO, would be to add "The first note has a natural followed by a
> sharp" at the beginning of the description.

+1

The test also shows the cancelling natural behaves
properly too- appearing once but only only once in the
bar.  A key of C would not show this.  You could argue
that this should be in a separate test, but why not
combine them?

Trevor