[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Towards a new pitch representation
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Towards a new pitch representation |
Date: |
Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:46:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:
> No need to decide how many of them. Just make the argument a list,
> instead of a cons cell, and give the user access to change the length
> of the list if they want to.
Huh? "Access to change the length of the list"? We are talking about a
list, don't we? Not an array? The list is whatever length you need at
any particular point of time. If it is a list of alterations, quite
possibly length 0.
> For the default distribution, the list length should be two, because
> we have symbols for quarter-tone alterations, but no symbols for
> anything smaller.
Huh? What point is there in declaring a certain list length in advance
rather than just using what is needed?
--
David Kastrup
Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Felipe Gonçalves Assis, 2010/12/30
Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Felipe Gonçalves Assis, 2010/12/31