[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Towards a new pitch representation
From: |
Felipe Gonçalves Assis |
Subject: |
Re: Towards a new pitch representation |
Date: |
Fri, 31 Dec 2010 14:28:24 -0300 |
Ok, Carl,
You vote for a list of integers, with arbitrary length.
There is actually no complication in not specifying its size.
Te midi engraver, for example, would just ignore entries
for which no value was specified. And in transpositions,
the unspecified values would just be considered zero.
In makam.ly, as I understand it, we would not need
longer lists, just one-sized lists with a different
magnitude specification, as in my current patch.
At least in order to maintain the current behaviour
with regards to transposition.
In general, anything that should behave the old way,
should use a single alteration level.
I look forward to hearing more opinions.
Thanks,
Felipe
- Towards a new pitch representation, Felipe Gonçalves Assis, 2010/12/30
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Carl Sorensen, 2010/12/30
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Felipe Gonçalves Assis, 2010/12/30
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Felipe Gonçalves Assis, 2010/12/31
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Carl Sorensen, 2010/12/31
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation, David Kastrup, 2010/12/31
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Carl Sorensen, 2010/12/31
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation,
Felipe Gonçalves Assis <=
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Carl Sorensen, 2010/12/31
Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Felipe Gonçalves Assis, 2010/12/30
Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Felipe Gonçalves Assis, 2010/12/31