[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length
|
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
|
Subject: |
Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length |
|
Date: |
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:01:34 -0700 |
On 3/4/11 4:42 PM, "Janek Warchoł" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
> Therefore i call for shortening 32nd unbeamed notes by 0.25 ss. Do you agree?
I can't see any downside to the proposal. So I agree.
Thanks,
Carl
- shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length, Janek Warchoł, 2011/03/04
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2011/03/04
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/03/04
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length, Trevor Daniels, 2011/03/05
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length, Janek Warchoł, 2011/03/05
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length, Janek Warchoł, 2011/03/08
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length, Trevor Daniels, 2011/03/08
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length, Graham Percival, 2011/03/09
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length, Janek Warchoł, 2011/03/09
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length, address@hidden, 2011/03/09
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length, address@hidden, 2011/03/09