[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision)
From: |
Dmytro O. Redchuk |
Subject: |
Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision) |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:56:21 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Wed 10 Aug 2011, 09:46 Graham Percival wrote:
> ** More new/changed types
>
> * Type-crash: any segfault, regardless of what the input file
> looks like or which options are given. Disclaimer: this
> might not be possible in some cases, for example certain
> guile programs (we certainly can’t predict if a piece of
> scheme will ever stop running, i.e. the halting problem), or
> if we rely on other programs (i.e. ghostscript). If there
> are any such cases that make segfault-prevention impossible,
> we will document those exceptions (and the issue will remain
> as a "crash" instead of "documentation" until the warning
> has been pushed).
> * Type-maintainability: anything which makes it difficult for
> serious contributors to help out (e.g. difficult to find the
> relevant source tree(s), confusing policies, problems with
> automatic indentation tools, etc).
> * Type-ugly: replaces Type-collision, and it will include
> things like bad slurs in addition to actual collision.
> * Type-ignorance: (fixme name?) it is not clear what the
> correct output should look like. We need scans, references,
> examples, etc.
No type-documentation any more? Why? Sorry, I've jumped a bit late thought.
I agree that we can classify work with tags/labels; however things like docs
improvement do not fit into these crash/maint/ugly/ignore, as for me.
--
Dmytro O. Redchuk "Easy to use" is easy to say.
Bug Squad -- Jeff Garbers
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), (continued)
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Keith OHara, 2011/08/11
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Graham Percival, 2011/08/11
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Trevor Daniels, 2011/08/13
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Graham Percival, 2011/08/16
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Janek Warchoł, 2011/08/22
Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Keith OHara, 2011/08/13
Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision),
Dmytro O. Redchuk <=
Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2011/08/15