[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision)
|
From: |
Dmytro O. Redchuk |
|
Subject: |
Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision) |
|
Date: |
Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:50:23 +0300 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Wed 10 Aug 2011, 22:04 Colin Campbell wrote:
> On 11-08-10 10:46 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
> > * Type-ignorance: (fixme name?) it is not clear what the
> > correct output should look like. We need scans, references,
> > examples, etc.
> >
>
> Perhaps more diplomatically as "Type- ambiguous"?
type-pendinginput?
--
Dmytro O. Redchuk "Easy to use" is easy to say.
Bug Squad -- Jeff Garbers
- GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Graham Percival, 2011/08/10
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Carl Sorensen, 2011/08/10
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Colin Campbell, 2011/08/11
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision),
Dmytro O. Redchuk <=
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Keith OHara, 2011/08/11
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Graham Percival, 2011/08/11
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Trevor Daniels, 2011/08/11
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Keith OHara, 2011/08/11
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Graham Percival, 2011/08/11
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Trevor Daniels, 2011/08/13
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Graham Percival, 2011/08/16
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Janek WarchoĊ, 2011/08/22
Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Keith OHara, 2011/08/13