Re: New git cl :: rebase patches

[Colin Campbell]

On 11-10-04 02:48 AM, address@hidden wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I uploaded a couple patches to Rietveld this morning just to have clean diffs 
> with current master (my bazillion commits on my local branch won't apply to 
> current master anymore).  I then download this diff and run the regtests.  
> However, with the new git cl, James sees patch_new and also runs the regtests.  
> Thus, he may be running failing retgetsts that I haven't been able to check 
> yet.  I think that the new git cl should ask the uploader if she wants a patch 
> to be labeled patch new instead of doing it automatically so that James doesn't 
> run regtests on patches that could be buggy.  Thoughts?
>
> Cheers,
> MS
> _______________________________________________


How about  patch status of "WIP", for "work in progress", or we could 
have the patch status default to needs-work, with the onus on the 
developer to set it to patch-new when it's ready to be checked?

Cheers,
Colin

--
I've learned that you shouldn't go through life with a catcher's mitt on both 
hands.
You need to be able to throw something back.
-Maya Angelou, poet (1928- )