Re: source for Patchy the autobot

[address@hidden]

On Oct 27, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Graham Percival wrote:

> Again, it would be great if somebody with more patience and/or
> pride in their work could take over Patchy.  As an incentive, you
> don't need to deal with our review process.  I'll hand git push
> ability for that repo out to anybody; just hack away and push
> without any concerns for code style or readability or reviews or
> whatever.
> 
> - Graham
> 

Hey Graham,

I'll have time in early 2012 to work on Patchy in more detail, but there is one 
contribution that I can make right away.  I thought that patchy did a full doc 
build (BUILD_ALL_DOCS = True), but the most recent problem with my in-notes 
patch leads me to believe that she doesn't.  Do you have any intuition as to 
how Patchy may be fine tuned to catch problems in the reg-tests/docs?  I'd 
gladly spend the hour necessary to write that Python code!

Cheers,
MS