Re: source for Patchy the autobot

[David Kastrup]

"address@hidden" <address@hidden> writes:

> On Oct 27, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
>
>> Again, it would be great if somebody with more patience and/or
>> pride in their work could take over Patchy.  As an incentive, you
>> don't need to deal with our review process.  I'll hand git push
>> ability for that repo out to anybody; just hack away and push
>> without any concerns for code style or readability or reviews or
>> whatever.
>> 
>> - Graham
>> 
>
> Hey Graham,
>
> I'll have time in early 2012 to work on Patchy in more detail, but
> there is one contribution that I can make right away.  I thought that
> patchy did a full doc build (BUILD_ALL_DOCS = True), but the most
> recent problem with my in-notes patch leads me to believe that she
> doesn't.

Why?  She never admitted that patch into master.

-- 
David Kastrup