Re: 2.15.18 regtests

[Phil Holmes]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <address@hidden>
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
Cc: "Devel" <address@hidden>
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: 2.15.18 regtests



On Nov 14, 2011, at 4:45 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:

> ----- Original Message ----- From: <address@hidden>
>
> > Thanks Phil!
> > The beams seem OK to me - could you let me know which ones seem like they 
> > are worse off?  I know that part of the code base well and can likely 
> > size it up relatively quickly.
>
> The ones in the penultimate bar of stem-tremolo.ly and the 2nd beamed pair 
> in beam-quanting-32nd, as well as the last pair in the 2nd measure.  They 
> all look a bit stumpy to my eyes.

Hey Phil,

The change in stem-tremolo.ly seems to bring that beam in line with all 
other beams that have tremolos, leaving less space between the tremolo and 
beam (which seems to be standard in traditionally typeset scores).
As for the beam quanting, I actually think the stumpiness is desirable - the 
longer beams make the difference between the notes look larger than it 
actually is.  I think the new beams look more in keeping with those around 
them.

Cheers,
MS
==================================


Fine.  No worries.

--
Phil Holmes