[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: critical issues
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: critical issues |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:36:04 +0100 (CET) |
> If we refuse thinking about stable releases by taking GUB as an
> excuse, the grand next stable release that will benefit users of
> many operating systems is likely to fall in the class "too little,
> too late".
I second David. Given that we develop within a GNU environment, bugs
specific to Windows and Mac shouldn't prevent stable releases. I can
even imagine that well announced release candidates for a new stable
version attracts developers to help fix issues with problematic
platforms.
Werner
- Re: critical issues, (continued)
- Re: critical issues, Graham Percival, 2012/01/02
- Re: critical issues, Janek WarchoĊ, 2012/01/02
- Re: critical issues, David Kastrup, 2012/01/02
- Re: critical issues, Graham Percival, 2012/01/02
- Re: critical issues, David Kastrup, 2012/01/03
- Re: critical issues, Phil Holmes, 2012/01/03
- Re: critical issues, David Kastrup, 2012/01/03
- Re: critical issues, Phil Holmes, 2012/01/03
- Re: critical issues, David Kastrup, 2012/01/03
- Re: critical issues, Phil Holmes, 2012/01/03
- Re: critical issues,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: critical issues, address@hidden, 2012/01/03
- Re: critical issues, David Kastrup, 2012/01/03
- Re: critical issues, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/01/03
- Re: critical issues, James, 2012/01/03
- Re: critical issues, David Kastrup, 2012/01/03
- Re: critical issues -- hope you're having fun, Graham Percival, 2012/01/03
- Re: critical issues -- hope you're having fun, James, 2012/01/03
- Re: critical issues -- hope you're having fun, David Kastrup, 2012/01/03
- Re: critical issues, David Kastrup, 2012/01/03
- Re: critical issues, David Kastrup, 2012/01/03