[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch going unpushed
From: |
Peter Chubb |
Subject: |
Re: patch going unpushed |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 08:18:26 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.8 Emacs/23.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
Hi Graham,
>>>>> "Graham" == Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
Graham> We don't really have a frog meister, so nobody is taking
Graham> responsibility for pushing
I have another patch waiting, that depends on the first.
Is there supposed to be a procedure for casual contributers to follow?
The other open-source projects (QEMU, Linux Kernel, uClinux) I
contribute to set up a Maintainer for each subsystem, and patches are
submitted to that person to get pushed.
I don't really want to get much more involved in LilyPond than I am already
--- I'm involved in two other open source projects (QEMU and Linux
Kernel at present) that take up most of my (little) free time. --- but
if you wanted to give me commit access, I could undertake to maintain
articulate.
Peter C
--
Dr Peter Chubb peter.chubb AT nicta.com.au
http://www.ssrg.nicta.com.au Software Systems Research Group/NICTA
- patch going unpushed, Graham Percival, 2012/03/22
- Re: patch going unpushed,
Peter Chubb <=
- casual contributors (was: patch going unpushed), Graham Percival, 2012/03/22
- Re: casual contributors (was: patch going unpushed), Janek Warchoł, 2012/03/23
- Re: casual contributors (was: patch going unpushed), Graham Percival, 2012/03/23
- Re: casual contributors, David Kastrup, 2012/03/23
- Re: casual contributors, Graham Percival, 2012/03/23
- Re: casual contributors, David Kastrup, 2012/03/23
- Re: casual contributors, Graham Percival, 2012/03/23
- Re: casual contributors, David Kastrup, 2012/03/23