[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Syntax change proposal:
From: |
Benkő Pál |
Subject: |
Re: Syntax change proposal: |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jul 2012 23:56:09 +0200 |
> I should have spotted this, but I've never used octave checks.
> I suppose others might ... :(
I have to use it for argus in music functions which duplicate that parameter.
e.g. I have a function perfect which transforms a4. to a4. ~ a8., and
in relative mode
it transforms a'4. to a'4. ~ a'8., which is not what I want, so I
write \perfect a=4.
(I guess it can be written so that the octave check is unneeded, but...)
p
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, (continued)
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, David Kastrup, 2012/07/16
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, Trevor Daniels, 2012/07/19
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, David Kastrup, 2012/07/19
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, Trevor Daniels, 2012/07/19
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, David Kastrup, 2012/07/19
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, Trevor Daniels, 2012/07/19
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, David Kastrup, 2012/07/19
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, Trevor Daniels, 2012/07/19
- Re: Syntax change proposal:,
Benkő Pál <=
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, Keith OHara, 2012/07/25
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, David Kastrup, 2012/07/25
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, Keith OHara, 2012/07/25
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, David Kastrup, 2012/07/25
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, David Kastrup, 2012/07/25
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, Keith OHara, 2012/07/25
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, David Kastrup, 2012/07/26
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, Keith OHara, 2012/07/26
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, David Kastrup, 2012/07/26
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, Trevor Daniels, 2012/07/26