[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: push patch for issue 2679
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: push patch for issue 2679 |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jul 2012 19:52:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Nalesnik <address@hidden> writes:
> I just tried to change the commit message as you said. When I check
> the amended patch, however, the subject line at the top of the file
> is:
>
> Subject: [PATCH] Issue 2679: Function for overriding broken spanners
>
> Apparently, [PATCH] is added automatically when I make a new patch
> with the LilyDev interface. (It doesn't appear in nano.) I can, of
> course, just remove "[PATCH]" manually and save.
Sorry for the false alarm. I just remember that git format-patch adds
that tag for the sake of posting such a patch or series to a mailing
list, and so of course git am (apply mail or something like that) will
remove it again anyhow.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: push patch for issue 2679, (continued)
- Re: push patch for issue 2679, David Nalesnik, 2012/07/24
- Re: push patch for issue 2679, David Kastrup, 2012/07/24
- Re: push patch for issue 2679, David Nalesnik, 2012/07/24
- Re: push patch for issue 2679, David Nalesnik, 2012/07/24
- Re: push patch for issue 2679, Phil Holmes, 2012/07/24
- Re: push patch for issue 2679, David Kastrup, 2012/07/24
- Re: push patch for issue 2679, Graham Percival, 2012/07/24
- Re: push patch for issue 2679, David Nalesnik, 2012/07/24
- Re: push patch for issue 2679, David Kastrup, 2012/07/24
- Re: push patch for issue 2679, David Nalesnik, 2012/07/24
- Re: push patch for issue 2679,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: push patch for issue 2679, Graham Percival, 2012/07/24
- Re: push patch for issue 2679, David Kastrup, 2012/07/24
- Re: push patch for issue 2679, David Nalesnik, 2012/07/24
- Re: push patch for issue 2679, Phil Holmes, 2012/07/24
- Re: push patch for issue 2679, David Nalesnik, 2012/07/24
- Re: push patch for issue 2679, Phil Holmes, 2012/07/24
- Re: push patch for issue 2679, David Kastrup, 2012/07/24
- Re: push patch for issue 2679, David Nalesnik, 2012/07/24
- Re: push patch for issue 2679, David Kastrup, 2012/07/24