Re: Doc: Clarify automatic beam setting (2701) (issue 6452072)

[dak]

On 2012/08/03 09:30:55, Graham Percival wrote:
> LGTM although I'm not wild about the @i{} bits, I can't immediately
think of a
> better alternative.

The obvious way would be to reorganize into fewer layers.  Nobody is
going to keep track of that many anyway.

That @i{} stuff is not really good: it has the wrong spacing and
penalties for a heading.  For example, it might get separated by a page
break from its following text.  It will also usually be followed by
indented text as opposed to normal headings.  And will probably be
indented itself.

http://codereview.appspot.com/6452072/