[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS (final)
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS (final) |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 11:28:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 12:09:51PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> "address@hidden" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I'd sent out a note of agreement before but I'll send out another one
> > just to signal that I'm 100% for incrementally freezing parts of
> > LilyPond's syntax. Specifically, I'm comfortable saying that
> > everything in the examples above should be frozen.
>
> \tempo syntax is quite an abomination. It is one of those things that
> regularly cause parser changes to trip up.
\times syntax is quite an abomination. It is one of those things
that regularly cause people to trip up.
> So when saying "Everything should be frozen", I'd rather hope
> this means the _elements_ to freeze, but not their exact current
> syntax.
Yes. I am working on
https://github.com/gperciva/lilypond-extra/tree/master/gliss
and will send an outline of future discussion in a few hours.
- Graham
Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS (final), Bernard Hurley, 2012/08/09
Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS (final), Janek Warchoł, 2012/08/09
Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS (final), Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/08/10
Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS (final), David Kastrup, 2012/08/10