Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS (final)

[Trevor Daniels]

Graham Percival wrote Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:05 AM


> Not much discussion after the mid-way point.  I'm not certain if
> this means that everybody agrees, or they just think I'm
> completely wrong and it's not worth even discussing it (as
> happened with the first proposal for stable release handling).
> http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_4.html
> 
> 
> ** Summary
> 
> Let’s start stabilizing portions of the LilyPond input syntax. We
> will guarantee that selected elements of the syntax will not
> change (even with convert-ly) during the 3.x releases. This will
> be a slow process, and the first phase (2012) will not even cover
> the entire “single staff notation” section in the tutorial.

I'm happy with this proposal.

Trevor