Re: 2.17.1 regtests

[address@hidden]

On 30 août 2012, at 02:21, Keith OHara <address@hidden> wrote:

> Phil Holmes <email <at> philholmes.net> writes:
> 
>> Anyway, I found a number that concern me.  See them at 
>> http://www.philholmes.net/lilypond/regtestresults/2.17.1/. 
> 
> I think all the concerns are covered by your tracker items, or otherwise
> covered, or not concerns. 
> 
> completion-heads-polyphony-2.png -- Mike's skylines made a minor change 
> to issue 1537
> 
> repeat-sign-global-size-10.png  -- as the author intended
> 
> stencil-color-rotation.png  -- In the past, rotation worked after LilyPond
> had placed everything, so users had to do our own collision avoidance.  
> We could tweak the hand-tuned rotation-point the test to accommodate 
> Mikes tighter spacing, if the collision is distracting.
> 
> mensural-ligatures.png         -- Mike's skylines patch changed spacing with 
> textLengthOn, but maybe for the better in most cases.  The overrides in
> this test  complicate the situation.  The change is that, in  
> \relative f { \textLengthOn \repeat unfold 4  {f'-"MEM" f-"EME" }}
> the words used to be in one line with the letters run up tight;
> now they stagger.
> 
> markup-note-dot.png  -- same as above, with markup instead of just text
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

I was gonna respond but Keith said everything I would have said.
The other way to deal w/ rotation is to build it into the stencil - the rotate 
command is applied right before going to the backend, but if ly:stencil-rotate 
is part of the stencil definition, the skyline patch will pick it up.

Cheers,
MS