[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:35:55 -0300 |
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Graham Percival
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 03:15:08PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > Thoughts? opinions? alternatives that I haven't considered?
>> > These discussions are going to produce a *lot* of emails.
>>
>> And if they come to conclusions, they are going to produce effects on
>> everybody. Including people using "LilyPond as a service".
>
> Sorry, I think I was unclear. If we have a separate email list
> for preliminary syntax discussions, then I imagine that something
> like the "everything is postfix" idea would go like this:
I don't see the point of having a separate list. If you don't know
what music functions are, and therefore are not qualified to
participate in the discussion, you could simply not participate in it?
I personally am not inclined to subscribe to yet another list. Also,
finding the discussion later on will be easier if it happens on
lilypond-devel.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- preliminary GLISS discussions, Graham Percival, 2012/08/29
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Janek Warchoł, 2012/08/29
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/08/29
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Janek Warchoł, 2012/08/29
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/08/30
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Graham Percival, 2012/08/30
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/08/31
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2012/08/31
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/08/31
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2012/08/31
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/08/31