[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:46:12 +0200 |
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:
> I personally am not inclined to subscribe to yet another list. Also,
> finding the discussion later on will be easier if it happens on
> lilypond-devel.
That's a good point. This actually reminds me of all the situations
when i was looking for some thread in the archives of -devel to
eventually discover it on -user.
So, instead of having a separate list, we can just use some [syntax]
or [GLISS] labels.
Janek
- preliminary GLISS discussions, Graham Percival, 2012/08/29
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Janek Warchoł, 2012/08/29
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/08/29
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Janek Warchoł, 2012/08/29
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/08/30
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Graham Percival, 2012/08/30
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/08/31
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2012/08/31
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/08/31
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2012/08/31
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/08/31
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/08/31