[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fixes position of mensural c clef (issue 6503091)
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Fixes position of mensural c clef (issue 6503091) |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Sep 2012 21:37:17 +0200 (CEST) |
>> I fully agree. Since we have no support for (3) yet, I will do a bit
>> of (2), and I really hope that Phil can bear with me :-)
>
> Is it really such a big deal if the code formatting is not perfectly
> consistent in every little detail? In particular, I would favor
> option
>
> 5. (relax 2 a bit) [...]
My `a bit of (2)' is exactly your (5).
Werner
- Re: Fixes position of mensural c clef (issue 6503091), (continued)
- Re: Fixes position of mensural c clef (issue 6503091), Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/07
- Re: Fixes position of mensural c clef (issue 6503091), Phil Holmes, 2012/09/09
- Re: Fixes position of mensural c clef (issue 6503091), lemzwerg, 2012/09/07
- Re: Fixes position of mensural c clef (issue 6503091), PhilEHolmes, 2012/09/07
- Re: Fixes position of mensural c clef (issue 6503091), graham, 2012/09/07
- Re: Fixes position of mensural c clef (issue 6503091), lemzwerg, 2012/09/07
- Re: Fixes position of mensural c clef (issue 6503091), lemzwerg, 2012/09/07
Re: Fixes position of mensural c clef (issue 6503091), PhilEHolmes, 2012/09/08
Re: Fixes position of mensural c clef (issue 6503091), lemzwerg, 2012/09/08
Re: Fixes position of mensural c clef (issue 6503091), PhilEHolmes, 2012/09/24
Re: Fixes position of mensural c clef (issue 6503091), lemzwerg, 2012/09/24
Re: Fixes position of mensural c clef (issue 6503091), PhilEHolmes, 2012/09/24