[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Isolated durations in music sequences now stand for unpitched notes
From: |
benko . pal |
Subject: |
Re: Isolated durations in music sequences now stand for unpitched notes (issue 22120043) |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Nov 2013 18:46:30 +0000 |
https://codereview.appspot.com/22120043/diff/40001/scm/music-functions.scm
File scm/music-functions.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/22120043/diff/40001/scm/music-functions.scm#newcode780
scm/music-functions.scm:780: ;;; that don't interpret them is harmless.
does that mean that
<c e>2. 4.
is turned into
<c e>2. e4.
? while I actually like not copying articulation, not copying chords
make the new feature (which I'm enthusiastic about) a bit less useful,
e.g. writing tied chords as
<c e>2. ~ 4.
would really be neat, making it more similar to the shorthand when
duration is omitted.
https://codereview.appspot.com/22120043/
- Re: Isolated durations in music sequences now stand for unpitched notes (issue 22120043), tdanielsmusic, 2013/11/09
- Re: Isolated durations in music sequences now stand for unpitched notes (issue 22120043),
benko . pal <=
- Re: Isolated durations in music sequences now stand for unpitched notes (issue 22120043), dak, 2013/11/09
- Re: Isolated durations in music sequences now stand for unpitched notes (issue 22120043), dak, 2013/11/09
- Re: Isolated durations in music sequences now stand for unpitched notes (issue 22120043), janek . lilypond, 2013/11/10
- Re: Isolated durations in music sequences now stand for unpitched notes (issue 22120043), ckenneth721, 2013/11/10
- Re: Isolated durations in music sequences now stand for unpitched notes (issue 22120043), ckenneth721, 2013/11/10
- Re: Isolated durations in music sequences now stand for unpitched notes (issue 22120043), dak, 2013/11/10
- Re: Isolated durations in music sequences now stand for unpitched notes (issue 22120043), dak, 2013/11/12