|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Re: Fwd: Re: Images on "Introduction" and "Features" |
Date: | Thu, 09 Jan 2014 13:42:23 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
Am 07.01.2014 10:31, schrieb Urs Liska:
-------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff: Re: Images on "Introduction" and "Features" Datum: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:30:51 +0100 Von: Urs Liska <address@hidden> An: Graham Percival <address@hidden> Am 03.01.2014 15:37, schrieb Urs Liska:Graham Percival <address@hidden> schrieb:On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 02:49:35PM +0100, address@hidden wrote:The images in the first text boxes on "Introduction" and "Features" are the same. Is there any specific reason for this?nah, I was just copying material from the old website to the new website. It makes sense to use different images.IMHO the 'flat-design.png' is much more suitable for "Features". On "Introduction" we're talking about "freeing from the details of layout", and it's somewhat contradictory to display an image beside that which *is* about tiny details.I slightly disagree there; showing that we have a mathematical representation of the tiny details *does* mean that humans are freed from dealing with it (since computers can do it). But I agree that might not be an obvious conclusion for non-programmers, so I have no objection to using a different image there.Good point. Maybe that can easily be made clear through the text. I'll consider this when I'm at that text anyway. I'd be happy to keep that image on "introduction" - it's so beautyful.I think my current patch (https://codereview.appspot.com/48430043/) would allow to keep the flat-design.png on "Introduction". Would you think one of the images on that page http://www.musicprintinghistory.org/engraving/about-music-engraving.html (I'd prefer fig. 3 or 4) would be suitable for "Features"? And would the "Use of Information" make it suitable for inclusion in our website?
Any opinions?However, independently from this concrete image: What is the way to add new images to the website/docs? I suppose they somehow have to get into the lilypond-extra repo?
Urs
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |