[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.0?
From: |
SoundsFromSound |
Subject: |
Re: 3.0? |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Jan 2014 20:43:11 -0800 (PST) |
dak wrote
> Joseph Rushton Wakeling <
> joseph.wakeling@
> > writes:
>
>> On 09/01/14 12:20, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Another problem is that LilyPond has a usage philosophy and workflow
>>> that strongly penalizes manual tweaks. Graphically/manually oriented
>>> workflows detract from the importance of getting good default
>>> typesetting.
>>
>> I'm not sure that's necessarily the case. Making it easy to
>> experiment with manual tweaks could be a very good way of working out
>> how things need to be engraved, and thus provide guidance for better
>> automated typesetting.
>
> That must be the reason why the typical Word document features the
> consistent use of document styles for arriving at typographically
> superior results.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> lilypond-devel@
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I honestly have never seen ONE Word document make use of styles. I'm not
kidding. In all the docs I've come across in all areas, people never use
them. Seriously! :)
Now, LibreOffice Writer on the other hand...
-----
composer | sound designer
LilyPond Tutorials (for beginners) --> http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/3-0-tp157489p157553.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: 3.0?, (continued)
- Re: 3.0?, Urs Liska, 2014/01/11
- Re: 3.0?, Paul Morris, 2014/01/11
- Re: 3.0?, Carl Peterson, 2014/01/12
- Re: 3.0?, Janek WarchoĊ, 2014/01/12
- Re: 3.0?, David Kastrup, 2014/01/12
- Re: 3.0?, Urs Liska, 2014/01/12
- Re: 3.0?, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2014/01/09
- Re: 3.0?, David Kastrup, 2014/01/09
- Re: 3.0?, Urs Liska, 2014/01/09
- Re: 3.0?, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2014/01/09
- Re: 3.0?,
SoundsFromSound <=
- Re: 3.0?, Carl Sorensen, 2014/01/10
Re: 3.0?, Phil Holmes, 2014/01/09
Re: 3.0?, David Kastrup, 2014/01/09