Re: 3.0?

[David Kastrup]

Joseph Rushton Wakeling <address@hidden> writes:

> On 09/01/14 12:20, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Another problem is that LilyPond has a usage philosophy and workflow
>> that strongly penalizes manual tweaks.  Graphically/manually oriented
>> workflows detract from the importance of getting good default
>> typesetting.
>
> I'm not sure that's necessarily the case.  Making it easy to
> experiment with manual tweaks could be a very good way of working out
> how things need to be engraved, and thus provide guidance for better
> automated typesetting.

That must be the reason why the typical Word document features the
consistent use of document styles for arriving at typographically
superior results.

-- 
David Kastrup