Re: Issue 3918: Add \alternatingTimeSignatures (issue 97110045)

[David Kastrup]

David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:

> Paul Morris <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> David Kastrup wrote
>>> "replace" is a bit too generic in my opinion.  I rather like the flair
>>> of \behold.  \substitute does not seem all that bad either, however.
>>
>> \behold does have flair, but I think it wouldn't really convey what we'd
>> want.  (i.e. pointing out what's already there or revealing something hidden
>> (like James' \et_voila!), rather than making a change.)
>>
>> Anyway, I thought of another one: \swap
>>
>> ...to stick with four-letter words like \hide and \omit. 
>
> No, the implication of "swap" is an exchange rather than a replacement.
> Overriding with a specific stencil is going to be verbose anyway.  How
> about "\adorn"?

Less cute: \retouch.

-- 
David Kastrup