Re: Master fails to compile

[Carl Sorensen]

On 5/22/15 10:59 AM, "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote:

>"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>>> 4.4.3.  It's the version that came with lilydev 1.1
>>>
>>> I'm surprised it did not blow up around your ears earlier.  That sounds
>>> about as old as we had in GUB before we were forced to upgrade in
>>> consequence of some template usage patterns last fall.  What's the
>>> current version of Lilydev?
>>
>> Looks like it's 3.0: IIRC James created it and so would be best placed
>> to say what the gcc version is.  I'm quite happy to upgrade my gcc
>> providing it's not impossible to work out how to do it.  Don't really
>> want to trash my current development environment to upgrade to a later
>> lilydev.
>
>Well, it would be good if you managed to move GCC up: I don't think it
>makes sense trying to accommodate GCC 4.4.3 any more as it is totally a
>stab in the dark for most developers to guess what may or may not
>compile on that version for what reason.

My copy of LilyDev 3.0 is at gcc 4.7.2.  My build on master just succeeded.


My master is currently at e52c5d72fc45e123c8574803ba52871e6fe8a596

Carl