Re: Doc: avoid implicit \relative; issue 4371 (issue 237340043 by address@hidden)

[k-ohara5a5a]

I started this with the belief that relative octave notation is easier
to write (for some people) but absolute octave notation is easier to
read, and thus the expectation that many examples would be simpler using
absolute pitches, or the new \fixed c'' {}.
However, there were not so many examples where a fixed octave reference
would really help.



https://codereview.appspot.com/237340043/diff/110001/Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely
File Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/237340043/diff/110001/Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely#newcode912
Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely:912: >>
One of only two examples in Learning where a single \relative was bad
advice.

https://codereview.appspot.com/237340043/diff/110001/Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely
File Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/237340043/diff/110001/Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely#newcode625
Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely:625: the passing note and a
slur:
This pair of examples changes the entry order of the pitches, so would
be easier to read with  \fixed c'

https://codereview.appspot.com/237340043/diff/110001/Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely#newcode646
Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely:646: }
The example is a case where a single \relative applied to parallel
voices might be practical.
It would line up better with its re-arrangement below if we use \fixed
c'

https://codereview.appspot.com/237340043/diff/110001/Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely#newcode668
Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely:668: >>
The other example in Learning where the single outer \relative was
really bad advice.

https://codereview.appspot.com/237340043/